Saturday, January 29, 2011

Chest Pains - Metallic Taste

call to Crohn's disease sufferers and relatives!

The author of our new publication No fear of Crohn's disease , John Hohl (MC self-interested parties), and PVH-Verlag editors seek contact with people with MC, which get at least 4 years without drugs and completely symptom-free. Information gathered through the exchange of experience we want to gather evidence and then make as many patients through more publications available. If you should belong to the group of people looking for us or want to help as a member (s), we would appreciate a contact very much. Please send in this case a short email to the editor at:
pvh.hd @ t-online.de
Keyword: "MC-experience".

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

8 Days Spotting After Period

Earn € 1000 $ on the day - fraud and fraudulent sites

earn € 300-500 on the day
money online right from your desktop
No risk - money on the Internet 200 € a day
Make € 600 every day
This trick I earn € 10,000 a month
Casino Trick win as You

Who knows these ads do not annoy them and lure countless naive people to gamble their money. The

is not really on this blog, but the topic concerns me a long time and the lack of logic (the study of the rational (final) reasoning) of many contemporaries is shocking. One can perhaps so see that personal development also heard that you recognize fraud, mastered his own greed and can not come at the expense of reason out of control. must also be a thinking person able to overcome his own ignorance and that of the mass and to provide in-depth questions to the truth - not bring about a desired, but a erstrittenen by logic - to come as close as possible. It is important to learn the primitive and limited thought out and unbiased and objective research with the help of reason, independently of authority and the mass of protesters, according to the solution of every problem.

The situation is the following: Countless cheap web sites and YouTube videos praising the very simple, safe and legal way to make money on the internet. To this end they propose a system where you play in online casinos roulette and sets a chip (for example, $ 1) on a color. If you lose one, doubling his bet. You lose again you double again.

The idea:

one wins in the first round I won a $ 1
you win in the second round has also won a $ 1, because the first one loses his bet, so a dollar. In the second set to twice that is 2 $. You win twice so $ 4. The use of war 1 +2 U.S. dollars $, a $ 3 dollar profit use and 4, making $ 1 net profit.

The same applies if you win in later rounds, if, for example 5 times is the wrong color and then the right one:

used: 1 $ +2 $ +4 $ +8 $ +16 $ +32 $ = 63 $ ,
use in the last round: 32 $, a $ 64 profit
->; Net profit: $ 1

Sounds logical. Why it does not work in practice, we shall see below.
The system is called the way Martingale ( Martingale ) and is as old as roulette itself (even older). These petty cheaters have not even come up (heat but no great power).


But first we try to identify with pure logic, why have the system must be a catch.
Socrates solved these problems with just one question: CUI BONO benefit-Who?
This is exactly the right approach. We can ask specific questions in our case, the same architecture.

  • exist why these casinos when they can be ripped off so easily?
  • why change anything because the casinos operate, that such system?
  • Why should the system will tell if it really works?
  • Why not someone programmed a bot of such a primitive game played by millions and does it? What could
  • these people like this have to release a faulty system and even to pay for advertising to make attention?


The logical conclusion is simple and all questions have the same result. The "system" can not work. Without having mathematics and game theory of random spark or idea, you MUST have come to the right result.

If you really want to deal with it, we can all prove it mathematically. The only thing you can not do is prove that it works, because that would contradict not only the logic but also in mathematics. Maybe in one or the other, like probably many, nevertheless give the impression that "it must" work. ignore or let us call it intuition must be better in view of the result above and the well-known weakness of the human mind to be deceived, - About this flawed logic. If that's not enough to serve the following mathematical statement:

First you have to make clear that at no Roulette 50% / 50% chance of red and black version, but only 48.6% / 48.6%, because there are 37 figures, including a zero (French roulette, two in the U.S.), so 36 colors, 18 red / 18 black - a chance for Red = (18/37) = 48.6%, same for black.

The bank wins so ever to ~ 51.4% by each operation.
The house advantage is taken on by 51.4% -48.6% = ~ 2.8%
Each individual bet wins, the bank approximately 2.8% of use, whether or not martingales, which is always true.

now referred a bill to Martingale, I help myself to the example statement from Wikipedia:

assumptions:
  • Zéro mean loss
  • The launch used a "piece", amounted to 10 €, after losing one after 20, 40, € 80, etc. set.
  • The procedure defined by the casino maximum amounts to just € 20,480, so that the Martingale is truncated to 12 games. (Anm.dV In general, the table limit is already at 12,000 € for a 10 min € use. / At online casinos is already at 1000 €)

The probability of losing a single game, 19/37 = 51%. The probability of losing

12 games in a row:
(19/37) ^ 12 = 0.0336% (ie about 1: 2974)

Correspondingly, the probability of ending a Martingale with profit:
1 - ( 19/37) ^ 12 = 99.9664%.

But: In the case of the happy conclusion of the player now only 10 €, while he loses in the event of a loss of € 40,950 (ie 10 + 20 + 40 +...+ 20 480 = 40 950).

Now one win so to 99.9664% 10 0.0336% € and you lose € 40,950.

expected value (99.9664% * 10) - (0.0336% * € 40,950) = 9.99664 - 13.7592 = € -3,763 applies (per series)

This value for the entire series of 12 games. We divide it by 12 and then get: € -0313, representing 2.8% of our home advantage (Mathematically, the step is not exactly the same). The casino then win every bet of 10 €; 31cent or 28cent if we are mathematically accurate.


following must be observed.

  • First, the table limit is lower in reality. So before you come to the border, can not increase more and lose everything.
  • The capital is lower in reality. Using the example of our cheaters should we deposit 50 $ -100 $ and play $ 1. So you can double up to 5 times (6 set times). Man loses after an average of 54 games. At that time, you earn a maximum of 54 $, you should always win the first time. You may have lost his entire capital.
  • Even if it looks like we can win as is to stop early enough, this is a fallacy. Even the first game can be six times the wrong color / number. The negative expected value of 2.8% is in the very first play.



In order to answer the last question in full:

What could these people from a faulty system, publish and even to pay for advertising to make attention?

These people are employed as an affiliate for the casinos, that is, they recruit new players and get a commission from the casino. The fact that the player will always lose, does not disturb,
because in most cases there is only a fixed amount at the time of first deposit (This is why they also advise a minimum of $ 50 or $ 75 for paid-for real money players give to the commission).
It also wins the casino, and therefore it is not interest to prevent such a thing.


to individual arguments:

"Online is not a dealer look at the monitor, so can not be prevented that the system is applied."

This is unnecessary because the "system" does not work. Go either in a live casino and demonstratively put to Martingale, or ask them directly if your "system" is allowed, the dealer will smile, make you the best deal chair and hope that you have brought a lot of money and time on the trust system. monitor if the casinos did, they might as well at your home computer, finally sees the casino and the stakes and all you see and do.


"The system works only with selected casinos."

This is rubbish. All casinos have an independently audited and constantly monitored RNG-Random Number Generator (RNG). Any abnormality would be detected and statistically corrected. Casinos use a lot of money on reliable and 100% random generators to have. These are not the weaknesses of a pseudo-random generator, but work with real random numbers generated from nuclear decay, thermal or cosmic noise or other appropriate sources.

The real reason for this statement is that these people are an affiliate, of course, not all casinos and would get nothing if the player logs on to another casino.
This applies even if you do not use the link provided, because without the casino the player can not associate with the affiliate.


"But you can test the system yet in play money mode!"

It is unlikely quickly to determine that the system does not work, because a small gain occurs frequently, as a great loss. In addition, play money tables usually have higher table limits and plays of players with more capital. Most believers are not stupid anyway long at the table mine, and after ten rounds can recognize that the system works reside. Who played hundreds of games, there will also lose everything.

quote Wikipedia: "Especially in the fact that a Martingale player will score relatively frequent small wins and wait for the surely, from total loss for a long time must be the explanation for the phenomenon of the proverbial beginner's luck."



Other systems work, of course, just as much, namely:

Montante Montante Américaine
Hollandaise
Progression d’Alembert 
Fitzroy-System
Parolispiel 
Marsch / Permanenzen
Zwei-Drittel-Gesetz 

Auch wenn man andere Systeme findet, oder sich welche ausdenkt sollte man immer Einstein im Hinterkopf behalten. Dieser hatte sich auch mit Roulette beschäftigt und kam zu dem Schluss:
"Man kann beim Roulette nur gewinnen, wenn man die Jetons klaut, während der Croupier wegsieht."

Um es auf den Punkt zu bringen: Kein Roulette System funktioniert!

Fazit
Geld gibt es nie umsonst. Auch im Internet muss man for money work, sometimes, other than it runs a fraudulent site or an online casino. And for roulette, there is no functioning system, and will also never give up. Additional Information: wizardofodds.com

A few examples of these fraudulent sites:

http://www.schlau-geld-verdienen.com
http://geld-verdienen-einfach.info
http://www . online-roulette-gewinnen.com
http://www.im-moment.info/wohlstandgeldsystem.htm

http://www.100eurojedestunde.com
http://schnellgeldverdienen.net http://www.schlauheit2010 . com
http://www.adlermethode.net
http://www.roulette-trick.eu
http://www.geldgeheimnis.com
http://geldplansystem.com
http://www.onlinecashmethod.com
http://www.relaxedroulette.com
http://www.123cashforyou.com
http://geldpoli.webs.com
http : / / webmaster-
http://www.revolutionarymoneysystem.com/10498521/

gibs report.org The same with the stock exchange (Forex) and eBooks, and of course the good old pyramid schemes, all of the same swamp.

eg
http://www.derreichesack.com
http://www.geldverdieneniminternet24.com (thanks to the spambot hitnerlassen of NEN comment added.)

information pages:
http://www. manusblog.de
http://abzocknews.blogspot.com

helpful and the free Firefox Web of Trust WOT addon

is so you can see quickly what one has to think of a page.

PS: you can not compare with the like roulette and games such as poker, the game really involve skill. Those who do not recognize the difference helps turn the head and only Google.

The whole thing is illegal. Not necessarily for the player, but for the operators of such sites (the fraudulent sites, not the casinos) are currently countless lawyers sharpen their teeth, because these sites have one thing in common: they failed against the information requirements, they are applying (illegal) gambling, and it is an immoral transactions by: § 138 BGB. So no one should get the idea is also such a page to tinker and strong for grabs. What to do about it: whenever you see an ad on Google, etc. from these, just click once, advertising is expensive.

On one of these pages I have now read the statutory warning:
"The effectiveness of the system is not guaranteed in the long term, just like the logo" voted the best method 2010 "and the mathematical proof, which are neither purely fictitious. the website "Methode2010.com" nor the administrators or the People who leave comments, can the players be held responsible for profits or losses. "

So both the great logo, and the mathematical proofs are fictitious, not surprisingly. Guaranteed and the system no long-term profit, I thought that is precisely the goal? Very interesting.


Who knows, other fraudulent sites, or would like to get rid of a comment / criticism is welcome to comment.

   
Flattr this

How Long To See Results Zumba

The loser vs. Index

The sometimes tedious training role, which I - Thanks to the additional motivation of the Winter Cup - administer driving, sometimes even really a strange flowers. Because as usual, when I complete can unwind and recuperate in the body stress, then I develop weird ideas while I ... For example, in the wonderful cycling race Elbinsel think ...

For example, it comes in the training, the idea of delirium-free index.

In the beginning the question: "How can I make my annual performance since even comparable, except only the odometer approaching draw?" It would be a kind of index, a factor, a number that combines my years results and reduced.

And in relation to the best people.

So I take as my result from the Münsterland Giro and calculate the percentage of the distance that my time on the was winner of the race. So in this way at Giro:

My Loser-index is thus 23rd For the love 0:00 I was the winner - a 100 I get when I race does not finish (as is unfortunately the time trials HH-B) or if I need exactly double the time of the Winners. So - the more I tend Gen 12:00, the better I am.

Simple, right?

I look back on 2010, I have 4 racing participation in Palmarés: The wonderful Elbinselrennen (will unfortunately take place, it is not this year), the Hamburg Cyclassics, the Münsterland Giro and the time trial Hamburg-Berlin (which I have not finished).

Well. And what is my loser Index for 2010? When Elbinselradrennen there was no transponder and no official timing, so I can appreciate my end only. Since I'm came in just behind the immensely powerful flow, so bad I could not be. I suppose it was 25: o)

for the botched time trial Hamburg-Berlin I get a nasty 100th For the Cyclassics ego can calculate well. So, as we it, the loser index have 2010:



A 45 words. Almost twice as "bad" as the respective winners.

Well, I'm curious how it will look after my scheduled 10 races in 2011.
My goal: I want to in the range 20 to 30 nationwide. That would be correct class.

Whether I do that?

What is your loser's index?
And what goals have you set yourself?

Looking forward to your Comments, Race on!




With the road bike through Italy

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Texas Driver's License Template

connection between viral infection and MC discovered

By here on 19 January 2011 mentioned study could also be first made the connection between a virus infection and Crohn's disease. In the press release of the Excellence Cluster Inflammation Research 22 November 2010 states: ". A known mutation in the so-called FUT2 gene leads to a decreased immune response to noroviruses is precisely this mutation was also identified in the Kiel study as further cause for Crohn's disease."
had previously been known that U.S. research evidence in mice had found evidence that the interaction of a genetic defect and specific viruses for the occurrence of Crohn's disease could be responsible. The topic virus infection and Crohn's disease will keep us busy from the PVH-Verlag editorial on ...

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Nyquil With Benzonatate

TOUR. Procycling - which cycling magazine I subscribe now?

You know, I am the last 2 years, subscriber of the TOUR. I was the concept, the racing sport I love so much from everyone's point of view to stage with many tests and tour reports, still convinced.

But not only since I my Cervélo R3 and ride with my cycling Sunclass cycling team will participate in races, I'm looking for professional cycling. (With all its ups and downs).

Unfortunately, in this respect, the TOUR in the last 2010s, spending no more convincing - even worse, reports and tests I've increasingly seen as dull, listless, and - worst of all - felt irrelevant.

contrast, the Procycling: professional sports, professional material, pro-tests from the cover to the last page. Fascinating photos of the best sports photographers and the wildest races around the globe. Fascinating.

And then? Then came the new TOUR.

The subscription has been terminated because I get to the two last issues a completely new magazine in his hands. WOW! New layout, new set of mirrors, new Typo - even the 80-year-old boys' logo has been refreshed!

colored photos that were on the Tour has always been great to be broken up by black and white clipping. Information numbers Facts'n 'Figures on each side complete the really cool new, stylish layout.

A completely new magazine! Clean. super!
A completely new magazine?

Well. Of course, not really. The key advertiser Canyon cut in the tests (as before) from the usual best. That must accept that again - but are by Marcel Wüst Procycling tested the bikes always all "top notch".

criticism of advertisers? Wes' piper ... etc.

Okay, but that the Cervélo S3 in the current aero Radt (though still in the top group) but with "weaknesses in the steering head stability" is 0.3 points worse than the Canyon scored, the worst in the same test with the values, had surprised me (... not really - see previous section)

By the way: What is 90-pound sprinter animal on the S3 just become world champion?

Well, never mind. I have subscribed to the TOUR again.
But I get my Procycling continue. At the station.

The kiosk will also Muddi what about my passion.


With the road bike through Italy

.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Megavision Movies Gratis En Espanol

Global study identifies 71 disease genes!

As the end of 2010 was known, after a new genetic study, the number of genes that are associated with Crohn's disease, the name, now doubled! A total of 71 different genes are now known as the trigger for Crohn's disease. That's more than have been identified for any other disease so far. These findings were recently on the website of Nature Genetics, published
http://www.nature.com/ng/index.html
was preceded by the largest genetic study on inflammatory bowel diseases in the world is between mid 2008 and late 2010 over 22,000 patients (and 50 research teams) participated from 15 countries.

Thursday, January 6, 2011

입던 속옷 판매

Castelli vs. Vaude vs. Nalini - (m) a plea for good racing apparel

Now I had a gift, Santa Claus rich - you too, I hope! - And still is my baby and had actually refused a very theatrical, Benefactor to my "silly hobby" with a gift, but then found themselves under new clothes fir tree.

Cervélo team wear in the Tour de France Special Edition 2010.Herrlich. Surprise success!

And for me Now the reason, my three big apparel brands Vaude, Nalini, and - now new - Castelli compare to each another.

Vaude I go on, since I started in 2008 with the extensive cycling - and still likes me, I prefer the orange pants. Comfort is very good, the workmanship is outstanding - all seams are still like new, only the colors a bit washed out and the pad - clear, after more than 20,000 kilometers - a little less fluffy than the beginning.

However, this only applies to the bib. My two other strapless Vaude pants have now broken down into their component parts.

The Cervélo-pants by Castelli not only fits perfectly - the pad with the so-called Kiss3 technology lets me take even longer in his position very tiring on the free part: When will my butt Vaude after 40-50 minutes restless. By Kiss 3 and Castelli I'm driving through loose 90 minutes.

at the Vaude-shirts I especially like the fabric - almost as soft as silk, very comfortable. But, I mean to watch, they dry very slowly, at least slower than Nalini. On a tour where the clothes from evening to next morning to be back in running order, could be the problem.

dries better as even Nalini. By the Italians I have two jerseys. These are also in production quality durability and unbeatable - after almost 3 years of continuous use they still look like new.

But the material ... scratched. Especially now that I could taste the velvety yet firm, fast drying Castelli Jersey several times a sweat test, I like me barely cover the very scratchy and rough, thus coming Nalini fabric.

And already I'm glad and happy that my favorite team - even though it has now been merged into Garmin Cervélo - is equipped of Castelli, for the road cycling clothing of this company is really my favorite: comfort, processing and performance are outstanding!

And only once this rear view ...

If the existing clothes in my collection is still not as good a shape (and would not have been so expensive), I'd give them all outright in the clothes donation for needy road cyclists and I stock up only with Castelli.

Only then my sweet nothing more for X-Mas 2011th Oh no, wait times, new road bike shoes (or at least re-Mavic Sidi?) Would still be due ...

What have you got an X-Mas for your stupid hobby?


.